Buy Low Price From Here Now
Nikon is a precision optical company with worldwide manufacturing, research and marketing capabilities. The Nikon name is equated with extraordinary photographic performance, innovation, precision and optical quality.PRODUCT FEATURES:Versatile and ultra-compact with a powerful focal length range of 55-200mm designed exclusively for Nikon DX format SLRs, this is an ideal 3.6X zoom lens for portraiture, sports or wildlife;An excellent companion to the AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED;New compact rod-type Silent Wave Motor (SWM) enables ultra-high speed autofocusing with exceptional accuracy and super-quiet operation;Nikon Super Integrated Coating minimizes ghosting and flare to provide even higher contrast and more vivid images, even in challenging light conditions;Two ED glass elements achieve minimized chromatic aberration and superior optical performance;Focus Mode switch enables quick-switching between A (Autofocus) and M (Manual Focus);9-blade rounded diaphragm for more natural out-of-focus highlights.
Readmore
Technical Details
- A Nikon Extra-Low Dispersion (ED) glass element delivers superior optical performance.- Internal Focus (IF) provides fast and quiet auto focusing without changing the length of the lens.
- Focus as close as 1.47 ft throughout entire zoom range.
- Non-Rotating front element provides for convenient use of circular polarizing filters and the Nikon Wireless Close-Up Speedlight System.
- A compact Silent Wave Motor (SWM) enables fast and quiet autofocusing, along with quick switching between autofocus and manual operation
See more technical details
By R. Coventry (Camden, Delaware)
Bought a new D80 it came with a 18-135mm lense. Have had problems with the lense and camera making connection. To the point when I had a one of a kind shot and the unit failed me. NOT GOOD. Today I noticed that the lense aperature is not shutting down. Took the lense off camera and can see a few fingers hanging down. I take very good care of my camera and am distressed - MAD - this is happening. I have had the camera for over 1.5 years. The lense should not fail like this.
By D. Brodsky
This lens is sharp and light and provides you with 7X zoom. Excellent walk-around lens. The built quality is not great though with its plastic mount. Lacks VR. But excels in sharpness, so if you like sharp and you like the range, this is the one to get.
By James H. Slater II (Charleston, SC)
I've been using this lens for about 10 months. I use it on my D60. I mostly use primes because they are so much faster (better for low light) and they are far sharper than any zoom that I can afford. So for any camera I own, I usually have one zoom that will do the job when no primes can. This lens fits that role nicely.
This lens has what many negative reviewers say: Pincushion distortion at the extreme wide end and vigneting at the extreme tele end. However, the image sharpness and color rendition is really good with this lens at every focal length and if you use NIKON Capture NX2 the distortions at all focal lengths are removed perfectly (that is the great thing about using an image editor made by your camera manufacturer...). This is consumer grade so it is SLOW. Use outdoors during the day or use the flash.
I paid $200.00 for this lens brand new...I know I got a great deal and I don't regret it at all. The construction is basic consumer grade (plastic city...)so I think a reasonable price for this lens is [...] ...TOPS. If you can find a great deal grab it. But be careful mounting and unmounting and try to avoid dropping the lens or your camera with this lens attached! You are paying for LOTS of glass here! It is difficult to make a lens sharp at every focal length on a zoom this wide but they did it really well.
Bottom line: this lens could be cheaper due to build quality but the zoom range, extreme sharpness at every focal length (for a consumer zoom), and good color rendition make it worthy of a 4 star review in my opinion.
And oh yeah, someone said something about bokeh in these reviews...Anyone who is buying this lens and is complaining about bokeh just doesn't know enough to know better. If you want bokeh get a fixed focal length lens with a wide aperature (f1.4 or f1.8). I know of no zooms under $1,000.00 that have decent bokeh. Lenses to try for better bokeh: Nikon 35MM f1.8 DXS G ($[...]), the 50mm F1.4G ($[...]), the Sigma 50mm 1.4 HSM ($[...]) or the BADASS 85mm 1.4 (BIG effin' bucks). You get what you pay for and you should be paying for GLASS to get great shots NOT cameras!
By Bowser Marzenai (Nevada)
It's difficult to write this review without substantial bias and background, but the best way to write this review is to speak from experience.
I got this lens with the Nikon D80, which many people have cited (somewhat accurately) as among the most notorious for soft images. (I do have objections to that, and I do say that a great prime lens such as the 50mm f/1.8 produces very sharp images.) The camera I received had focus problems; after fixing them, the problem was somewhat corrected, but I'm willing to consider the possibility that I got a bad copy of the lens.
While problems can vary from copy to copy, some problems are bred by design. The pincushion distortion is prominent all the way down the barrel. It's most noticeable in cityscapes and any other subject material composed of straight lines, and after five months and more than 2,500 pictures, I see the distortion in some of my nature photography, as well. As you've likely seen in the customer image gallery, the lens does perform well in spite of (and, in a few cases, because of) the distortion. But more often than not, the distortion is less than aesthetic; while there are lenses that barrel-distort an image for aesthetic effect, this is not one of them.
Unfortunately, Photoshop can't adequately fix many of the images that suffer from the distortion. There's only so much distortion that can be corrected, and the 18-135mm lens frequently meets or surpasses that limit. The easiest pictures to correct are those in which the subject is far away, but if the images have objects in the more immediate foreground, I can't fix the image well without significantly distorting those objects.
Nevertheless, there is minor compensation at the very least. A feature under CS3's Filter > Distort > Lens Correction compensates for some of the distortion. For total control, I use Edit > Transform > Perspective, and I use the "Switch between free transform and warp modes" to bring up a grid that enables me to "pull" sections of the image. But there's only so much an image can be corrected without making it worse, and the lens tend to produce images that surpass the limit.
The bokeh in this lens is a significant issue, as well. The lens does a poor job blurring the background; spots of light are not blurred out smoothly, and many highlights show a great amount of detail. To my eye, it's the equivalent of nails on a chalkboard. My prime lens produces good bokeh, and using it as a comparison to the 18-135mm has helped me understand how critical bokeh is to a picture. Fortunately, Photoshop can compensate if I add a mask, completely blur out the background image, and paint over the parts of the image that are supposed to be sharp. But it's frustrating to have a lens that doesn't get good bokeh directly after I fire the shutter. There's only so much an image can be doctored before it becomes blatantly obvious.
Chromatic aberration is a minor issue with this lens, especially in low-light situations. For example, one of my lightning pictures shows a considerable blue fringing around the power pole and a lot of red fringing around the lightning strikes. But when it comes right down to it, chromatic aberration borders on splitting hairs, especially since the optics were never destined to be professional-caliber. Plus, chromatic aberration is nicely remedied by Photoshop's RAW tools, and uncorrected aberration is not obvious when I zoom out the image, anyway.
Because I received this as a kit lens, I investigated this and other lenses well after buying the camera. I learned most of the pros and cons just as I was shooting pictures. One of the major pros is the focal length; the low 18mm and the high 135mm zoom appear great practically and logistically. Another major pro is the width; not many kit lenses boast of a 67mm diameter. Perhaps the biggest pro in my book is the minimum focusing distance; eighteen inches on a zoom lens gives me a useful macro to work with.
Granted, this lens has a lot of great features that look appealing on paper, but the cons can render those features null and void. The lens works great as a kit lens and outperforms many kit lenses on the market, but if you have the opportunity to buy the camera body separately and purchase a higher-quality lens down the road, you will likely consider the extra money well spent.
By P. Cappiello (Virginia Beach, Va. USA)
So now you've got your Nikon DLSR and you've read the books and seen the videos. Wow your camera does all sorts of things. Three months later you are still taking all kinds of great pictures but you notice that 95% of the time the camera is in Auto mode. Welcome to the real world of photography. And that bag with all that stuff you just had to have ? Yeah, six months later you see that only dorks and noobs carry that crap around. So you only want one lens on your rig and some kind of filter- lens caps are silly too when outside. So which one lens ? Well The Nikon 18-200 would be the way to go, but maybe you don't want to drop $600 on a lens. So the next choice is this lens. At half the price its a great lens to leave on all the time. You won't miss the reach of the 200mm that much. Just be careful when you buy from Amazon shopping. Half the places selling are selling gray market. refurbs, demos , used , etc. You gotta read the fine print. Have fun.
Images Product
Buy Nikon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras Now
No comments:
Post a Comment